[ADMIN] Testing

[Ken Dibble]

Not receiving my own posts?


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Richard Kaye]

Some of us are.

--

rk

-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech <profoxtech-***@leafe.com> On Behalf Of Ken Dibble
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 3:31 PM
To: ***@leafe.com
Subject: [ADMIN] Testing

Not receiving my own posts?



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/***@DM5PR10MB1244.namprd10.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Paul H. Tarver]

Got it!

Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-***@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ken
Dibble
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 2:31 PM
To: ***@leafe.com
Subject: [ADMIN] Testing

Not receiving my own posts?


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/080c01d3c604$1346c410$39d44c30$@tpcqpc.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Tracy Pearson]

It's a setting of the list-serve. If I remember right, it's off by default.

-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-***@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ken
Dibble
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 3:31 PM
To: ***@leafe.com
Subject: [ADMIN] Testing

Not receiving my own posts?


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000f01d3c605$b788ac40$269a04c0$@powerchurch.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Ken Dibble]

I always receive my own posts from ProFox. I may have set it years
ago but certainly have not changed the setting since then.

Post by Tracy Pearson
It's a setting of the list-serve. If I remember right, it's off by default.
-----Original Message-----
Dibble
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 3:31 PM
Subject: [ADMIN] Testing
Not receiving my own posts?

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Ed Leafe]

Post by Tracy Pearson
It's a setting of the list-serve. If I remember right, it's off by default.

The default for lists on my server is to get a copy of your own posts. You can change that if you wish.

-- Ed Leafe






_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/ECC49479-4A90-4F61-A98A-***@leafe.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Ted Roche]

Post by Ken Dibble
Not receiving my own posts?

Well, you already know what they say, right?
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4uAWnB1W8kaE5qJtRGYpj2tn6eOzOzEXG98MRA-***@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Ted Roche]

I, otoh, am seeing my posts, so it's probably not a global change in
maillist behavior.

Post by Ted Roche

Post by Ken Dibble
Not receiving my own posts?

Well, you already know what they say, right?
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4thdEqjA+7YA3WnwXP1TjFtDhn4bL35S5aEC2MWo+***@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Ken Dibble]

No, it's some peculiarity in my text and/or subject line that some
filter's RegEx code did not anticipate, I'm sure.

Around Christmas I sent a long email to my brother with about 20
links to Christmas songs on YouTube pages, interspersed with
commentary. His email server kept rejecting the message. I eventually
broke it down to one of those links by sending them to him one at a
time. The one that didn't go through was not immediately
distinguishable from any of the others, just another string of random
characters, but his ISP insisted on rejecting it, over and over and over.

It was a legitimate YouTube link like all the others; click it, the
song played, without any unintended or unexpected other results.

This is what we have come to in our quests to defeat spam--and the
longer this type of strategy is followed--the higher the percentages
of legitimate messages that won't be delivered, eventually rendering
email useless.

Ah well...

Ed, if you see any of my messages, please see if my original one is
stuck in the filter.

Thanks.

Ken

Post by Ted Roche
I, otoh, am seeing my posts, so it's probably not a global change in
maillist behavior.

Post by Ted Roche

Post by Ken Dibble
Not receiving my own posts?

Well, you already know what they say, right?
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Ed Leafe]

Ed, if you see any of my messages, please see if my original one is stuck in the filter.

Yes, it was marked as spam. I’ll send the first and delete the dupes.


-- Ed Leafe






_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/C066987C-0291-4CC1-848D-***@leafe.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too s

[Ken Dibble]

Post by Ed Leafe
Yes, it was marked as spam. I’ll send the first and delete the dupes.

Thanks very much, Ed.

Ken


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Paul H. Tarver]

More importantly, who are "THEY"?

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-***@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted
Roche
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 3:07 PM
To: ***@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing

Post by Ken Dibble
Not receiving my own posts?

Well, you already know what they say, right?
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/084501d3c607$e54a0320$afde0960$@tpcqpc.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Ken Dibble]

Post by Ken Dibble
Not receiving my own posts?

I don't think it likes my subject line. I'll try resending with a
different subject.


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Ken Dibble]

Post by Ken Dibble
Not receiving my own posts?

The message to which I am replying was sent out at 3:30 pm EDT March
27 2018. It's in the ProFox archive. I received it almost
immediately. Others have seen it and replied.

I sent a message at 2:21 pm EDT March 27 2018 with subject: "Get
Method Issue with Hidden Property". As of 4:04 pm that message is not
in the archive and has not arrived back to me.

I resent that message at 3:51 pm EDT March 27 2018. As of 4:04 pm
that message is also not in the archive and has not arrived back to
me. (And I've already received my own reply to Tracy...)

Somebody will probably say "email is not guaranteed to be
instantaneous, yadda yadda, who knows what could be wrong with all
the newfangled filtering, yadda yadda, it's probably at your end,
yadda yadda...

I've been subscribed to ProFox since I still had some red hair. In
EVERY SINGLE CASE where a message I sent to ProFox did not show up in
under a minute, the problem has been, in EVERY SINGLE CASE, a problem
at the ProFox server. :) It has NEVER been anything else.

So, Ed, please take a look and see what happened to my messages.

Thanks!

Ken



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Gene Wirchenko]

At 13:05 2018-03-27, Ken Dibble <***@stny.rr.com> wrote:

[snip]

Post by Ken Dibble
Somebody will probably say "email is not guaranteed to be
instantaneous, yadda yadda, who knows what could be wrong with all
the newfangled filtering, yadda yadda, it's probably at your end,
yadda yadda...
I've been subscribed to ProFox since I still had some red hair. In
EVERY SINGLE CASE where a message I sent to ProFox did not show up
in under a minute, the problem has been, in EVERY SINGLE CASE, a
problem at the ProFox server. :) It has NEVER been anything else.
So, Ed, please take a look and see what happened to my messages.

Ed, I am having similar problems. I E-mailed you twice about
this, and I have not received a reply. What is going on?

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/***@mtlp000083
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Ed Leafe]

Post by Ken Dibble
So, Ed, please take a look and see what happened to my messages.

Ed, I am having similar problems. I E-mailed you twice about this, and I have not received a reply. What is going on?

I got emails from you a few months ago. I re-enabled your subscription, and wrote back to inform you. Did you never get my reply?


-- Ed Leafe







--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/signed
text/plain (text body -- kept)
application/pgp-signature
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/24ECEA58-C5E4-4CA0-ADBE-***@leafe.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[AndyHC]

Well gMail always blocks them - I just set Thunderbird to copy them to
my inbox

Post by Ken Dibble
Not receiving my own posts?

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/edf88ed5-bcf8-5dda-595d-***@hawthorncottage.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Fernando D. Bozzo]

Because Gmail by default treat ProFox email as spam, I am using what Ted
once wrote, about adding ProFox to the contacts list, and from then I have
no more ProFox emails in Spam.

Another option in Gmail is creating a filter and checking "Never mark this
as spam". I have many lists like this.

Well gMail always blocks them - I just set Thunderbird to copy them to my
inbox

Post by Ken Dibble
Not receiving my own posts?

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGQ_Ju=4FH4yNEkcu6NqLxgn_BZM-***@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[Man-wai Chang]

CONTACT....
Got this one....

Post by Ken Dibble
Not receiving my own posts?

--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Fedora 25 Server Spin
/( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ***@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGv=MJCMOgS-bMhuTHEaTHfMrFqHiKVMZw-***@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.